Supernumerary chromosome 6 marker associated with paternal uniparental isodisomy of chromosome 6 in a patient with a syndromic disorder of insulin secretion.

The association of both uniparental disomy and small supernumerary marker chromosomes is rare. Clinical impact depends on the presence of imprinted genes and/or the unmasking of a recessive mutation of the chromosome involved in the uniparental disomy and the euchromatic content of the sSMC. Here, we report on the second case of a patient harbouring a de novo supernumerary marker chromosome 6 causing partial trisomy 6p12.3p11.1 associated with a paternal uniparental isodisomy of chromosome 6. Our patient presented with intrauterine growth retardation, macroglossia, initial developmental delay and transient neonatal diabetes mellitus followed by a congenital hyperinsulinism. Diabetes and intrauterine growth retardation can be linked to the paternal isodisomy of the imprinted locus on chromosome 6q24 whereas developmental delay is probably due to the small supernumerary marker chromosome. However, the clinical impact of partial trisomy 6p is difficult to address due to a limited number of patients. The careful clinical examination and the molecular characterization of additional patients with trisomy 6p are needed to further predict the phenotype for genetic counselling. Finally, uniparental disomy should be considered when a sSMC involving a chromosome containing imprinted regions is detected, especially in the prenatal setting.

A 22q13.1 duplication in mosaicism including SOX10.

Waardenburg syndrome (WS) is characterized by the association of sensorineural hearing loss and pigmentation abnormalities. Among the four types, WS Type 2 (WS2) is the only one without a remarkable distinguishing feature. Here, we report a patient initially diagnosed with WS2 who exhibits a 446 kb mosaic duplication in chromosome 22q13.1, encompassing SOX10, and detected using whole genome sequencing in a trio. The patient, a 46,XY boy, presents with profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, right heterochromia iridium, left bright blue iris, and skin-depigmented areas in the abdomen and limbs. Vestibular and imaging tests are normal, without inner ear or olfactory bulb malformations. Bilateral cochlear implantation did not prevent language and speech delays. Moderate congenital chronic constipation and neurodevelopmental difficulties were also present. Given the few genes included in this duplicated region (only one OMIM gene with dominant inheritance), this report provides further delineation of the phenotype related to duplications encompassing the entire SOX10 gene.

Risk estimation of uniparental disomy of chromosome 14 or 15 in a fetus with a parent carrying a non-homologous Robertsonian translocation. Should we still perform prenatal diagnosis?

OBJECTIVE: Uniparental disomy (UPD) testing is currently recommended during pregnancy in fetuses carrying a balanced Robertsonian translocation (ROB) involving chromosome 14 or 15, both chromosomes containing imprinted genes. The overall risk that such a fetus presents a UPD has been previously estimated to be around ~0.6-0.8%. However, because UPD are rare events and this estimate has been calculated from a number of studies of limited size, we have reevaluated the risk of UPD in fetuses for whom one of the parents was known to carry a nonhomologous ROB (NHROB). METHOD: We focused our multicentric study on NHROB involving chromosome 14 and/or 15. A total of 1747 UPD testing were performed in fetuses during pregnancy for the presence of UPD(14) and/or UPD(15). RESULT: All fetuses were negative except one with a UPD(14) associated with a maternally inherited rob(13;14). CONCLUSION: Considering these data, the risk of UPD following prenatal diagnosis of an inherited ROB involving chromosome 14 and/or 15 could be estimated to be around 0.06%, far less than the previous estimation. Importantly, the risk of miscarriage following an invasive prenatal sampling is higher than the risk of UPD. Therefore, we do not recommend prenatal testing for UPD for these pregnancies and parents should be reassured.

Large Duplications Can Be Benign Copy Number Variants: A Case of a 3.6-Mb Xq21.33 Duplication.

Segmental aneusomies are usually associated with clinical consequences, but an increasing number of nonpathogenic cytogenetically visible as well as large cryptic chromosomal imbalances have been reported. Here, we report a 3.6-Mb Xq21.33 microduplication detected prenatally on a female fetus which was inherited from a phenotypically normal mother and grandfather. It is assumed that male patients harboring Xq or Xp duplication present with syndromic intellectual disability because of functional disomy of the corresponding genes. Female carriers are generally asymptomatic because of preferential inactivation of the abnormal X. In the present case, the 3.6-Mb-duplicated segment encompasses only 2 genes, DIAPH2 and RPL4A. Since the asymptomatic grandfather carries the duplication, we hypothesize that these genes are not dosage sensitive and/or involved in cognitive function. Our observation further illustrates that large copy number variants can be associated with a normal phenotype, especially where gene density is low. Reporting rare cases of large genomic imbalances without a phenotypic effect can be very helpful, especially for genetic counseling in the prenatal setting.

Prenatal diagnosis of 24 cases of microduplication 22q11.2: an investigation of phenotype-genotype correlations.

OBJECTIVE: Microduplication 22q11.2 is primarily characterized by a highly variable clinical phenotype, which ranges from apparently normal or slightly dysmorphic features (in the presence or absence of learning disorders) to severe malformations with profound mental retardation. Hence, genetic counseling is particularly challenging when microduplication 22q11.2 is identified in a prenatal diagnosis. Here, we report on 24 prenatal cases of microduplication 22q11.2. METHODS: Seventeen of the cases were also reanalyzed by microarray analysis, in order to determine copy number variations (CNVs, which are thought to influence expressivity). We also searched for possible correlations between fetal phenotypes, indications for invasive prenatal diagnosis, inheritance, and pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 24 cases, 15 were inherited, six occurred de novo, and three were of unknown origin. Termination of pregnancy occurred in seven cases and was mainly decided on the basis of ultrasound findings. Moreover, additional CNVs were found in some patients and we try to make a genotype-phenotype correlation. CONCLUSION: We discuss the complexity of genetic counseling for microduplication 22q11.2 and comment on possible explanations for the clinical heterogeneity of this syndrome. In particular, we assessed the co-existence of additional CNVs and their contribution to phenotypic variations in chromosome 22q11.2 microduplication syndrome.

A French Approach to Test Fetuses with Ultrasound Abnormalities Using a Customized Microarray as First-Tier Genetic Test.

Cytogenetic microarray analysis is now the first-tier genetic test used in a postnatal clinical setting to explore genomic imbalances in individuals with developmental disability and/or birth defects. However, in a prenatal setting, this technique is not widely implemented, largely because the clinical impact of some copy number variants (CNVs) remains difficult to assess. This limitation is especially true in France where termination of pregnancy for medical reasons may be performed at any stage of gestation. During a period of 15 months, we investigated 382 fetuses presenting with ultrasound anomalies, using a customized microarray designed to avoid the detection of CNVs raising challenges for genetic counseling. After excluding common aneuploidies, 20/374 (5.3%) fetuses had a pathogenic CNV, among which 12/374 (3.2%) could have been detected by karyotyping, whereas 8/374 (2.1%) were cryptic. Within these 374 cases, 300 were ongoing pregnancies at the time of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) testing. For these pregnancies, we detected 18/300 (6%) pathogenic CNVs, among which 6/300 (2%) were cryptic. Using this approach, only 2/300 (0.6%) of the detected CNVs raised difficulties for genetic counseling. This study confirms the added value of this strategy in a prenatal clinical setting to minimize ethical issues for genetic counseling while enhancing the detection of genomic imbalances.

Recurrent 70.8 Mb 4q22.2q32.3 duplication due to ovarian germinal mosaicism.

A mosaicism is defined by the presence of two or more populations of cells with different genotypes in one individual. Chromosomal germinal mosaicism occurs in germ cells before the onset of meiosis. Previously, few studies have described germinal mosaicism. In this study, we report on two siblings who carried identical pure and direct interstitial 4q22.2q32.3 duplication. Procedure investigations included complete clinical description, conventional cytogenetic analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) array experiments and microsatellite study searching for parental origin of the duplication. Microarray CGH and further FISH experiments with BAC clones showed the same 70.8 Mb direct duplication, dup(4)(q22.2q32.3). Molecular studies of the 4q duplication were consistent with maternal origin associated with mitotic or meiotic rearrangements. This structural chromosomal aberration was associated in both cases with increased nuchal translucency, growth retardation and dysmorphy. Cardiopathy and lung malformations were only evident in the first case. These clinical manifestations are similar to those previously reported in previous studies involving pure 4q trisomy of the same region, except for thumb and renal abnormalities that were not obvious in the presented cases. The amplified region included genes involved in neurological development (NEUROG2, MAB21L2, PCDH10/18 and GRIA2). The recurrent 4q duplication in these siblings is consistent with a maternal ovarian germinal mosaicism. This is the first description of germinal mosaicism for a large chromosomal duplication and highlights that genetic counselling for apparently de novo chromosome aberration should be undertaken with care.

A new mutation in the AFP gene responsible for a total absence of alpha feto-protein on second trimester maternal serum screening for Down syndrome.

Alpha feto-protein (AFP) is a major plasma protein produced by the yolk sac and the liver during the fetal period. During the second trimester of pregnancy, APF and betahCG serum concentrations are commonly used for screening Down syndrome. AFP deficiency is rare (estimated to be 1/105,000 newborns) and only one sequence alteration has previously been reported in the AFP gene. We report a new mutation in exon 5 of the AFP gene, leading to a total absence of AFP on 2nd-trimester maternal serum screening for Down syndrome, confirmed on the amniotic fluid. Despite this, fetal development and birth were normal. After PCR-amplification, the whole AFP gene was sequenced. The new mutation was a guanine to adenine transition in position 543 creating a premature stop codon in position 181. In order to search for eventual modifications of the amniotic fluid profile, proteins were separated by electrophoresis and compared with 10 normal amniotic fluids sampled at the same developmental age (18 weeks). In the amniotic fluid of our patient albumin rate was reduced whereas alpha1 and beta protein fractions were increased, suggesting that AFP deficiency may modify the distribution of protein fractions. This observation emphasizes the complex molecular mechanisms of compensation of serum protein deficiency. Studies on other families with AFP deficiency are necessary to confirm this observation.

Cytogenetic investigation of a child with a mosaic isochromosome 18q and ring 18q.

We report on a baby girl from non-consanguineous Palestinian parents with intrauterine growth retardation, low birth weight, and developmental delay. She had a short stature, microcephaly, a prominent metopic suture, a glabellar haemangioma, exophthalmos, hypertelorism, upslanting palpebral fissures, horizontal nystagmus, flat nose, cleft lip and palate, a short neck, widely spaced nipples, umbilical hernia, flexion deformity of the wrist, ulnar deviation of fingers, and right club foot. Cortical atrophy, enlarged ventricles, a thin corpus callosum, thoracic hemivertebrae, and a ventricular septal defect were detected as well. High resolution chromosome analysis identified in 92% of cells an isochromosome 18 and in 8% of cells a ring 18. Molecular cytogenetic investigations confirmed that it was an i(18q) and a r(18q). The hypothesis to account for this anomaly and its corresponding phenotype are discussed.